Case Study
ZS was at significant risk of losing our beachhead with key clients due to the appearance of our solutions; the CTO’s first request when I joined was to make our products more visually consistent. Eager to please in my new role, I quickly learned that the legacy tech stack made a centralized solution impossible.

Company & Position
ZS Associates, Associate Partner & later Partner (2011-2024)
Details
ZS was competing against companies like Salesforce, Veeva, and Axtria — software companies that had invested polished, cohesive interfaces. Our suite of 40+ products had accumulated years of inconsistent UIs created on different tech stacks. It was affecting the throughput of our UX team – we were not creating new designs quickly or consistently enough. But this wasn’t just an internal issue – it was coming up in satisfaction surveys and renewal conversations as well. We needed a design system — but our legacy technology meant that we had to build one in stages.
Actions
- Version 1, 2012 – 2015.
- Audited all solutions for common interface elements. Standardized interaction design patterns and associated code wherever the stack allowed.
- Conducted a competitive analysis (Salesforce, Veeva, others) and presented findings and risk to the Shareholder Council, securing approval to invest.
- Version 2, 2015 – 2018.
- A company-wide rebranding initiative created the opening we needed. Extended the effort to include digital asset guidelines.
- Conducted a new competitive assessment (Aktana, Veeva, Axtria, IQVIA).
- Began separating front- and back-end code and established a centralized repository for design standards and front-end component consumption.
- Version 3, 2018 – 2020.
- Established a dedicated function within the product group — UX designers, front-end developers, and a fractional product manager — responsible for creating and maintaining standards, governance, and cross-team communication.
- Defined new processes for how full-stack UX, visual designers, and engineers would collaborate.
Outcome & Impact
- Three generations of a progressively more sophisticated design system, delivered over ten years.
- Client and sales team feedback on solution appearance dropped significantly as disparate products began to look and behave like a cohesive suite.
- UX delivery throughput increased; visual consistency across all licensable software established and maintained.
- This is also a story about patience — about working with the constraints you have while keeping a longer horizon in view. You can’t always solve the whole problem on day one.
Work Samples
Version 1. Standardization of ad hoc design components.


Version 2. Homegrown Design Standards, no central repository.



Version 3. Professional Design System with integrated code, governance, etc.

Leave a Reply